In this issue
 

 



Version française
 

pdf version
 

 

 

Africa Rice Center


Please send your questions, comments or suggestions to:
Savitri Mohapatra, Editor
(s.mohapatra@cgiar.org)

January-April 2006

Number 11


Unlocking farmers’ best-kept secrets
A joint WARDA-IFAD project helps document local knowledge and innovations

Did you know that you can get rid of termites by smoking them out with tobacco leaves; that if rice seeds are dressed with wood ash, they can be safely stored; or that tethering of livestock in cereal fields can help reduce Striga infestation in those fields?

If you haven’t heard of these simple solutions, you are not the only one. Quite a few agricultural researchers and extension workers are also not aware of them. These are some of the little known local “best practices” that are being identified, validated and documented, thanks to the project Participatory adaptation and diffusion of technologies for rice-based systems (PADS) in West Africa (Phase II).

The project is carried out by the Africa Rice Center (WARDA) and its partners in four West African countries—Ghana, Guinea, Mali and The Gambia—with support from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).

The project focuses on the inland valley systems, and its overall aim is to improve rice productivity, stimulate crop diversification and increase farmers’ incomes in these systems. To achieve its aim, the project seeks to identify, evaluate, enhance and scale out sustainable innovations—not  only from research institutes, but also home-grown ones, in particular from farming communities.

Indeed, a major challenge of PADS is to change the mindset of the people who work with farmers. “Most of us automatically assume that scientists are the sole source of innovation in agriculture,” says Dr Paul Van Mele, WARDA Technology Transfer Specialist, who is leading this project.

“We tend to forget that farmers play a significant role as local innovators capitalizing on their day-to-day experience,” he explains. Unfortunately, their knowledge often gets lost over time or remains locked up in the memories of individual families and communities, because of the lack of suitable mechanism for dissemination.

The project will select some of the successful and widely applicable local innovations for dissemination in the region through farmer-to-farmer extension and mass media. “Some of these local innovations may even be considered as researchable topics by scientists for their experiments,” Dr Van Mele comments.

But how do you go about finding local innovations? And once identified, how do you document them? Finally, how do you select the ones that are most suitable for scaling up?

To address such questions, in 2005-2006 four training workshops were held in each of the countries for project coordinators, extension workers, scientists and NGOs. These focused on concepts, tools and techniques to better understand farmers’ perceptions and innovations:

Tools to classify knowledge and understand knowledge flows

Knowledge matrix: This tool helps to classify the knowledge of people on any subject into four types: deep, shallow, mistaken and missing. Based on this, appropriate interventions can be developed. For instance, if farmers have deep knowledge about controlling an insect pest, this is the place where local innovations are likely to be plenty and where scientists can learn from them.

Local names: What’s in a name—you might wonder. But it is important to remember that local names often tell a story or give the summary of a problem. For example, in some parts of Ghana, rice off-types are known as Modiak (male rice), which implies a negative connotation, because rice is considered a female crop, a life giver.

Well-being analysis: The poorest are often forced to innovate to survive. The well-being analysis allows farmers to identify the poorest section in their own community. In the project, the tool is also used to evaluate the social dimensions of farmer-to-farmer extension and to measure the impact of its interventions.

Tools and techniques to collect, document and scale out local innovations

Interviewing techniques: During the workshop, participants learn how to listen to farmers and use open-ended questions to elicit useful answers from them.

Documenting techniques: The art of storytelling is a valuable skill for describing and documenting local innovations in a more reader-friendly way.

Validation criteria: Participants from diverse backgrounds learn to identify the local innovations that are worthwhile to disseminate, using such criteria as whether the innovations are sensitive to local cultures; safe; environmentally friendly; likely to be accepted; and whether the required materials are readily available.

Tools for scaling out: Towards the end of the workshop, participants explore the advantages, drawbacks and potential of various extension methods, and develop action plans for large-scale dissemination of local innovations and underlying scientific principles.

“One of the most important findings emerging from the Project is that people in developing countries often face similar challenges,” observes Dr Van Mele, giving the example of how the videos on rice seed health, made in Bangladesh with rural women, have become a big hit in many African villages.

The Project not only facilitates the sharing of knowledge and innovations from one community to another and from one region to another, but also aims at institutionalizing pro-poor research and development processes—all crucial contributions to solving global issues.

 


© Africa Rice Center 2006
  Fair use of this material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested